3.3 OCD List

Moving on to Week 3’s OCD list, we’re assuming:

• Weeks 1 and 2 have already reduced noise and clarified mechanical value
• You are no longer chasing exhaustion, soreness, or volume
• The goal is preservation with capacity, not maximal hypertrophy

Please ensure that you check with your physician before engaging in any exercise program. Explore working with a personal trainer to check your form, have a custom-designed workout and guidance in progression. You could essentially do this by starting with 3 sessions. The 1st one is for evaluation to bench mark your start point, the 2nd is to go through an exercise program designed for you (ask to film the exercises and any corrections you get for your form). You then go about working on your exercises for 6-8 weeks and then have your 3rd session be one where your trainer checks where you are and progresses or adapts your program. Thereafter you can book sessions 6-8 weeks apart for further progressions.

Having said that, here is a layout of how to think about structuring your program.

1. Use isometric loading to reinforce tendon–ECM signaling (health, not rehab)

Action

• Select one isometric per session tied to a compound pattern:
  • squat → wall sit or split-squat hold
  • hinge → hip hinge hold with light load
  • push → plank or incline push-up hold
  • pull → supported hang or row hold

Parameters

• 20–40 seconds
• 2–3 sets
• moderate intensity (≈5–6/10 effort)
• breathing stays slow and nasal

Why

This is not a tendon-rehab prescription. Long, heavy isometric holds — often 30–45 seconds at high effort — are used in some tendinopathy protocols. That is a different purpose. Here, the goal is healthy tissue maintenance and structural signaling, not pain suppression or tendon rehabilitation.

Isometric contractions are useful because they generate meaningful tension with minimal joint movement and relatively low eccentric disruption. That allows force to travel through the muscle–tendon–ECM unit without the same degree of lengthening strain that accompanies dynamic eccentric work.

Mechanically, muscle force does not travel directly from sarcomere to bone. It is transmitted through cytoskeletal proteins, costameres, integrins, extracellular matrix, aponeuroses, tendon, and bone. The extracellular matrix is part of the force-transmission system, not packaging material (Gillies & Lieber, 2011).

Isometric loading provides a clean structural signal:

• muscle fibers generate force
• tendon receives load
• ECM experiences tension
• joints remain stable
• neural drive is practiced without chaos

For aging tissue, post-injury tissue, and recovery-limited states, this is valuable because the signal is strong enough to matter but not so disruptive that repair becomes expensive.

Isometrics also help retrain confidence. A joint that can hold force steadily becomes less threatening to the nervous system while a tendon that experiences controlled tension becomes more reliable in force transfer. The key is moderate, repeatable tension.

Main points:

• Tendons and ECM respond to tension duration, not just peak load
• Short, moderate isometrics:
  • stimulate collagen turnover
  • improve force transmission
  • avoid fiber-level inflammatory damage
• This is maintenance signaling, not injury remodeling (which requires heavier, longer holds)

2. Train the reversal phase to reduce strain-rate injury

Action

• In one exercise per muscle group per session:
  • control the lowering
  • pause briefly (½–1 second)
  • reverse direction smoothly into the lift

Key instruction

• The pause is not a rest but a reorganization point
• Eliminate bounce, snap, or collapse

Why

This is not the same as “slow eccentrics” for hypertrophy. We already addressed slow eccentrics in the mechanical-signaling supplement. Here, the focus is strain rate and transition control.

Eccentric contractions exist on a spectrum. Damage rises when lengthening occurs under high force, high velocity, long muscle length, poor motor control, and novelty, especially when the tissue is unaccustomed to that loading pattern (Proske & Morgan, 2001; LaStayo et al., 2003). The reversal phase is often the moment where strain becomes poorly controlled. At the bottom of a movement, the system must coordinate:

• muscle lengthening
• tendon stretch
• fascial tension
• joint position
• neural timing
• transition back into force production

A rapid bounce or collapse can create a spike in strain rate. because the tissue is experiencing force arriving too quickly. Controlled reversals are meant to reduce that spike and preserve mechanical signal while lowering unnecessary inflammatory cost.

The data support the underlying components: eccentric damage is influenced by strain, velocity, novelty, and control; slow, controlled loading can preserve tension while reducing uncontrolled tissue disruption; tendon and ECM adapt to mechanical loading but do so on slower timelines than muscle.

Main Points:

• Most ECM micro-injury occurs at the eccentric–concentric transition
• Slowing the reversal (technically the lengthening or eccentric phase):
  • lowers peak strain rate
  • improves motor unit coordination
  • protects connective tissue without eliminating mechanical signal

(distinct from “slow eccentrics” used to induce muscle damage.)

3. Load end ranges calmly to maintain immune tolerance

Action

• Choose 1–2 positions where you:
  • enter an end range under control
  • hold briefly or move slowly
  • remain pain-free and breathing easily

Examples:

• supported deep squat
• long lunge with upright torso
• overhead reach with light load

Why

End range is a neuroimmune state.

A range that is rarely visited becomes poorly mapped by the brain, resulting in a weakening of motor control of those areas. Proprioceptive confidence decreases as force output becomes less predictable, leading the nervous system to guard. Over time, an unused range can become an inflammatory range, not because the tissue is inherently damaged, but because the organism no longer trusts it.

Calm end-range loading allow the tissue to learn:

• this range is familiar
• this position is supplied
• this joint can be controlled
• this structure does not need guarding

This is especially important in aging and sarcopenia because functional loss often begins at the edges of capacity. People stop using deep hip flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, thoracic rotation, overhead reach, and ground transitions. Then these ranges disappear from daily life, and their absence becomes fragility. We can think of what we’re trying to do as territorial maintenance.

Main Points:

• End ranges that are unused become immunologically suspicious
• Gentle loading maintains:
  • proprioceptive input
  • vascular supply
  • immune familiarity
• This is how range is preserved, not forced

4. Support ECM hydration deliberately on loading days

Action

• On days you train:
  • drink fluids before movement
  • drink again after training
  • do not rely on thirst alone

Why

In skeletal muscle, individual fibers do not simply contract in isolation. Force is transmitted laterally and longitudinally through connective tissue networks. These networks include endomysium, perimysium, epimysium, aponeurosis, and tendon. Their organization affects how force is distributed and how efficiently muscle contraction becomes movement.

The ECM also participates in repair. After injury or loading, immune cells, fibroblasts, fibro-adipogenic progenitors, and satellite cells interact within the matrix environment. If the matrix is healthy, it supports regeneration. If it is stiff, fibrotic, inflamed, or disorganized, repair can shift toward scar, fat infiltration, or incomplete regeneration.

Main Points:

• Collagen and fascia are hydration-dependent
• Dehydrated ECM:
  • stiffens
  • transmits force poorly
  • generates more inflammatory signaling under load
• Hydration supports viscoelastic recovery and immune cleanup

(Precise timing windows are extrapolated; hydration dependence itself is well established.)

5. Replace pain-driven stretching with breath-coupled mobility

Action

• Use movements that combine:
  • joint motion
  • slow pace
  • relaxed breathing

Examples:

• joint circles
• supported transitions
• floor-based mobility flows

Why

Fascia and ECM are not only passive materials, they also happen to be richly innervated, vascularized, and mechanically responsive. Movement that preserves glide, circulation, and proprioceptive mapping may support tissue tolerance without provoking a new inflammatory cycle.

This is also where mobility differs from stretching. Stretching is about how far can the tissue can go. Mobility demands function at this range. For sarcopenia and frailty, a deep position that cannot be controlled does not reduce risk. A slightly smaller range that can be entered, held, and exited calmly is far more useful.

Main Points:

• Painful stretching:
  • provokes protective tone
  • increases inflammatory signaling
• Calm mobility maintains tissue glide without immune alarm

6. Schedule one mobility-dominant recovery day per week

Action
Choose one:

• Tai Chi
• Qigong
• animal-flow–style ground work
• gentle flow yoga (no end-range forcing)

Why

We’re talking about low-load, whole-body tissue motion.

Mobility-dominant practices provide mechanical input without high recovery cost. They move fluid, stimulate proprioception, expose joints to varied angles, and provide low-grade fascial shear. In older adults, practices like Tai Chi are supported by systematic reviews showing benefits for balance, functional mobility, and fall-risk-related outcomes. The evidence is stronger for function and balance than for direct ECM remodeling, so the ECM claim should be treated as mechanistic synthesis rather than proven clinical endpoint. The connective system needs movement that is:

• rhythmic
• low threat
• multi-planar
• non-exhaustive
• neurologically attentive

Strength training gives the body a high-value mechanical signal whilst mobility-dominant practice teaches the body how to distribute that signal through more of the organism.

Main Points:

• Rhythmic, low-load movement:
  • enhances lymphatic flow
  • supports macrophage resolution
  • clears ECM debris without new damage
• Think of this as connective-tissue hygiene

7. Give one chronically irritated tissue intentional silence

Action
For one body region:

• no targeted loading
• no stretching
• no “fixing”
• focus on simple range of motion or unloaded mobility work

Why

Recovery is an active biological program whereby after loading or injury:

1. Neutrophils and early immune cells participate in debris clearance.
2. Macrophages coordinate the transition from inflammation to repair.
3. Satellite cells activate and contribute to muscle regeneration.
4. Fibro-adipogenic progenitors support repair but can also contribute to fibrosis or fat infiltration if signaling goes awry.
5. Fibroblasts and ECM-producing cells remodel connective tissue.
6. Collagen is synthesized, cross-linked, degraded, and reorganized.
7. The tissue either returns stronger, returns scarred, or remains chronically irritated.

This is an actively orchestrated process. While it may look like “doing nothing”, your body is actually working on completing a sequence.

Main Points:

• Immune resolution requires absence of repeated provocation
• Silence is a completion signal for the tissue to resolve the injury

8. Understand what “recovery margin” actually means

Action

• Notice whether you:
  • regain strength easily
  • feel calm between sessions
  • stop accumulating soreness

Why

Margin is the organism’s ability to absorb stress without losing function. It is built from:

• immune resolution capacity
• mitochondrial reserve
• sleep quality
• connective tissue integrity
• tendon stiffness matched to muscle force
• energy availability
• autonomic flexibility
• metabolic stability
• neuromuscular reliability

Two people with similar lean mass may live very different lives. One can climb stairs, recover from illness, tolerate surgery, and regain function while the other can’t. The difference is not just mass but also includes system reserve. Margin explains why training must change across life phases because it has to preserve different forms of capacity under different constraints.

Main Points:

• Recovery margin reflects:
  • ECM integrity
  • immune resolution capacity
  • autonomic balance
• When your margin shrinks, adaptation stalls, even with perfect training

---

There Is No Final Program

One of the most persistent myths in fitness is the idea that there is a perfect program waiting to be discovered. Find the right exercises, figure out the right volume and split, and repeat forever. But your body is not adapting toward a final destination. Rather we should think of it as adapting to a context.

A healthy training program for a 25-year-old athlete, a 45-year-old parent, or an 80-year-old trying to remain independent, should not be identical. The idea here is to preserve function for that particular context. Sometimes that means building strength, sometimes it’s balance or tendon capacity, and sometimes it’s trying to preserve muscle through an illness or surgery.

Throughout this issue we have returned to the same themes:

• provide clear signals
• apply meaningful tension
• allow immune resolution
• preserve recovery margin

These principles remain useful whether the objective is:

• performance,
• rehabilitation,
• healthy aging,
• or simply continuing to move well through life.

While it’s sometimes useful from a motivation standpoint to focus on a goal (a competition, a performance, etc), I’d like to have us think of exercise and building muscle as a way to facilitate capacity. To get anywhere we have to clear and lay down a path, and too often we neglect to develop that path in our own bodies. Frailty is a disconnection of the body from the environment such that it loses its ability to respond and adapt to the environment. For entirety of our species’ existence it has meant imminent death. Even with our advances in medicine and technology today that prediction still holds. We can use assistive devices to help us maneuver the environment and “get by”, but the body’s decline still matches life expectancy. The ultimate longevity hack is to maintain a functioning and adaptive physical form and the main tissue that enables this in the human body is muscle.

---

References

Gillies AR, Lieber RL. Structure and function of the skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. Muscle & Nerve. 2011;44(3):318–331. doi:10.1002/mus.22094

Csapo R, Gumpenberger M, Wessner B. Skeletal muscle extracellular matrix — what do we know about its composition, regulation, and physiological roles? Frontiers in Physiology. 2020;11:253. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00253

Kjaer M. Role of extracellular matrix in adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to mechanical loading. Physiological Reviews. 2004;84(2):649–698. doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2003

Sinha U, Csapo R, Malis V, et al. Role of the extracellular matrix in loss of muscle force with age and unloading using magnetic resonance imaging. Frontiers in Physiology. 2020;11:626. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00626

Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Effects of isometric training on the elasticity of human tendon structures in vivo. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2001;91(1):26–32. doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.26

Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Ito M, Fukunaga T. Effects of isometric training on the elasticity of human tendon structures in vivo. Journal of Physiology. 2001;536(Pt 2):649–655. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0649c.xd

Bohm S, Mersmann F, Arampatzis A. Human tendon adaptation in response to mechanical loading: a systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise intervention studies on healthy adults. Sports Medicine – Open. 2015;1:7. doi:10.1186/s40798-015-0009-9

Lazarczuk SL, Maniar N, Opar DA, Duhig SJ, Shield AJ. Mechanical, material and morphological adaptations of healthy lower limb tendons to mechanical loading: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2022;52(10):2405–2429. doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01695-y

Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. The impact of loading, unloading, ageing and injury on the human tendon. Journal of Physiology. 2019;597(5):1283–1298. doi:10.1113/JP275450

Heinemeier KM, Schjerling P, Heinemeier J, et al. Lack of tissue renewal in human adult Achilles tendon is revealed by nuclear bomb 14C. FASEB Journal. 2013;27(5):2074–2079. doi:10.1096/fj.12-225599

Rio E, Kidgell D, Purdam C, et al. Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar tendinopathy. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;49(19):1277–1283. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094386

Graham ZA, Gallagher PM, Cardozo CP. Focal adhesion kinase and its role in skeletal muscle. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 2015;36(4–5):305–315. doi:10.1007/s10974-015-9415-3

Hornberger TA. Mechanotransduction and the regulation of mTORC1 signaling in skeletal muscle. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2011;43(9):1267–1276. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2011.05.007

Rindom E, Vissing K. Mechanosensitive molecular networks involved in transducing resistance exercise-signals into muscle protein accretion. Frontiers in Physiology. 2016;7:547. doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00547

Wackerhage H, Schoenfeld BJ, Hamilton DL, Lehti M, Hulmi JJ. Stimuli and sensors that initiate skeletal muscle hypertrophy following resistance exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2019;126(1):30–43. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00685.2018

Fischer M, Rikeit P, Knaus P, Coirault C. YAP-mediated mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle. Frontiers in Physiology. 2016;7:41. doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00041

Proske U, Morgan DL. Muscle damage from eccentric exercise: mechanism, mechanical signs, adaptation and clinical applications. Journal of Physiology. 2001;537(Pt 2):333–345. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00333.x

LaStayo PC, Woolf JM, Lewek MD, Snyder-Mackler L, Reich T, Lindstedt SL. Eccentric muscle contractions: their contribution to injury, prevention, rehabilitation, and sport. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2003;33(10):557–571. doi:10.2519/jospt.2003.33.10.557

Fridén J, Lieber RL. Eccentric exercise-induced injuries to contractile and cytoskeletal muscle fibre components. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 2001;171(3):321–326. doi:10.1046/j.1365-201X.2001.00834.x

Hody S, Croisier JL, Bury T, Rogister B, Leprince P. Eccentric muscle contractions: risks and benefits. Frontiers in Physiology. 2019;10:536. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00536

Damas F, Phillips SM, Libardi CA, et al. Resistance training-induced changes in integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis are related to hypertrophy only after attenuation of muscle damage. Journal of Physiology. 2016;594(18):5209–5222. doi:10.1113/JP272472

McHugh MP. Recent advances in the understanding of the repeated bout effect: the protective effect against muscle damage from a single bout of eccentric exercise. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2003;13(2):88–97. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.02477.x

Chargé SBP, Rudnicki MA. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiological Reviews. 2004;84(1):209–238. doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2003

Yin H, Price F, Rudnicki MA. Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche. Physiological Reviews. 2013;93(1):23–67. doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2011

Arnold L, Henry A, Poron F, et al. Inflammatory monocytes recruited after skeletal muscle injury switch into antiinflammatory macrophages to support myogenesis. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2007;204(5):1057–1069. doi:10.1084/jem.20070075

Tidball JG. Regulation of muscle growth and regeneration by the immune system. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2017;17(3):165–178. doi:10.1038/nri.2016.150

Rigamonti E, Zordan P, Sciorati C, Rovere-Querini P, Brunelli S. Macrophage plasticity in skeletal muscle repair. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:560629. doi:10.1155/2014/560629

Dort J, Fabre P, Molina T, Dumont NA. Macrophages are key regulators of stem cells during skeletal muscle regeneration and diseases. Stem Cells International. 2019;2019:4761427. doi:10.1155/2019/4761427

Joe AWB, Yi L, Natarajan A, et al. Muscle injury activates resident fibro/adipogenic progenitors that facilitate myogenesis. Nature Cell Biology. 2010;12(2):153–163. doi:10.1038/ncb2015

Uezumi A, Fukada S, Yamamoto N, Takeda S, Tsuchida K. Mesenchymal progenitors distinct from satellite cells contribute to ectopic fat cell formation in skeletal muscle. Nature Cell Biology. 2010;12(2):143–152. doi:10.1038/ncb2014

Uezumi A, Ikemoto-Uezumi M, Tsuchida K. Roles of nonmyogenic mesenchymal progenitors in pathogenesis and regeneration of skeletal muscle. Frontiers in Physiology. 2014;5:68. doi:10.3389/fphys.2014.00068

Theret M, Rossi FMV, Contreras O. Evolving roles of muscle-resident fibro-adipogenic progenitors in health, regeneration, neuromuscular disorders, and aging. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021;12:673404. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.673404

Molina T, Fabre P, Dumont NA. Fibro-adipogenic progenitors in skeletal muscle homeostasis, regeneration and diseases. Open Biology. 2021;11(12):210110. doi:10.1098/rsob.210110

Saito Y, Chikenji TS, Matsumura T, et al. Exercise enhances skeletal muscle regeneration by promoting senescence in fibro-adipogenic progenitors. Nature Communications. 2020;11:889. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14734-x

Wynn TA, Ramalingam TR. Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nature Medicine. 2012;18(7):1028–1040. doi:10.1038/nm.2807

Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450–462. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015

Mann CJ, Perdiguero E, Kharraz Y, et al. Aberrant repair and fibrosis development in skeletal muscle. Skeletal Muscle. 2011;1:21. doi:10.1186/2044-5040-1-21

Urciuolo A, Quarta M, Morbidoni V, et al. Collagen VI regulates satellite cell self-renewal and muscle regeneration. Nature Communications. 2013;4:1964. doi:10.1038/ncomms2964

Silver JS, Günay KA, Cutler AA, et al. Injury-mediated stiffening persistently activates muscle stem cells through YAP and TAZ mechanotransduction. Science Advances. 2021;7(23):eabe4501. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe4501

Haut TL, Haut RC. The state of tissue hydration determines the strain-rate-sensitive stiffness of human patellar tendon. Journal of Biomechanics. 1997;30(1):79–81. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00109-9

Pratt RL. Hyaluronan and the fascial frontier. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(13):6845. doi:10.3390/ijms22136845

Stecco C, Stern R, Porzionato A, et al. Hyaluronan within fascia in the etiology of myofascial pain. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2011;33(10):891–896. doi:10.1007/s00276-011-0876-9

Eisner LE, Nardo L, Hasty KA, et al. The role of the non-collagenous extracellular matrix in tendon and ligament mechanics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2022;144(5):050801. doi:10.1115/1.4053061

Huang ZG, Feng YH, Li YH, Lv CS. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Tai Chi for preventing falls in older adults. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013661. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013661

Chen W, Li S, Wang R, et al. Tai Chi for fall prevention and balance improvement in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1236050. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1236050

Li Y, Feng Y, Liu J, et al. The comparison between effects of Taichi and conventional exercise on functional mobility and balance in healthy older adults: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1281144. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281144

Nyman SR. Tai Chi for the prevention of falls among older adults: a critical analysis of the evidence. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 2021;29(2):343–352. doi:10.1123/japa.2020-0155

Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age and Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy169

Larsson L, Degens H, Li M, et al. Sarcopenia: aging-related loss of muscle mass and function. Physiological Reviews. 2019;99(1):427–511. doi:10.1152/physrev.00061.2017

Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2001;56(3):M146–M156. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146

Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. The Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–762. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9

Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2006;61(10):1059–1064. doi:10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059

Manini TM, Clark BC. Dynapenia and aging: an update. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2012;67(1):28–40. doi:10.1093/gerona/glr010

Schoenfeld BJ. The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010;24(10):2857–2872. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e840f3

Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Van Every DW, Plotkin DL. Loading recommendations for muscle strength, hypertrophy, and local endurance: a re-examination of the repetition continuum. Sports. 2021;9(2):32. doi:10.3390/sports9020032

Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Davies TB, Lazinica B, Krieger JW, Pedisic Z. Effect of resistance training frequency on gains in muscular strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2018;48(5):1207–1220. doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0872-x

Ralston GW, Kilgore L, Wyatt FB, Buchan D, Baker JS. Weekly training frequency effects on strength gain: a meta-analysis. Sports Medicine – Open. 2018;4:36. doi:10.1186/s40798-018-0149-9

Fragala MS, Cadore EL, Dorgo S, et al. Resistance training for older adults: position statement from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2019;33(8):2019–2052. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003230

American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2009;41(3):687–708. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670

Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2013;45(1):186–205. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318279a10a

Kellmann M. Preventing overtraining in athletes in high-intensity sports and stress/recovery monitoring. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2010;20 Suppl 2:95–102. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01192.x

Smith LL. Cytokine hypothesis of overtraining: a physiological adaptation to excessive stress? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2000;32(2):317–331. doi:10.1097/00005768-200002000-00011

Peake JM, Neubauer O, Della Gatta PA, Nosaka K. Muscle damage and inflammation during recovery from exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2017;122(3):559–570. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00971.2016

---

Too much? No time to run around and get those labs, or perhaps you can’t get an appointment with your doctor till next year? As always you can default to the Life is Short List anytime. Life is for living, after all!

See you next week!